Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12578
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Werdiger, F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yogendrakumar, V. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Visser, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kolacz, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hill, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Parsons, M. W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bivard, A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T01:57:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T01:57:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 26669560 (ISSN) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12578 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: During the subacute phase of ischemic stroke, MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is used to assess the extent of tissue injury. Segmentation of DWI infarct is challenging due to disease variability, but Deep Learning (DL) provides a solution, outperforming existing methods on small datasets. However, a lack of clinically meaningful performance evaluation hinders clinical translation. Here we develop a DL DWI segmentation tool and provide clinical performance review. Methods: Subjects in this retrospective study presented with stroke symptoms and later underwent DWI imaging. DL architectures U-Net and DenseNet were used to develop a DWI segmentation tool. The Dice Similarly Coefficient (DSC) was used to select the best- and worst-performing model. Clinical experts reviewed these models on the clinical test set, agreeing with the model if no 'significant? error was present. The average agreement with the model and interrater agreement was also derived. Results: In total, 573 participants with an ischemic stroke were included. The DenseNet delivered the best model (DSC = 0.831 � 0.064) with a mean inference time of 0.07 s. Clinicians compared this with the worst model (U-Net, DSC = 0.759 � 0.122), agreeing with the DenseNet predictions more than the U-Net (83.8 % vs. 79.3 %). Clinicians also agreed with each other more over performance interpretation when evaluating the DenseNet over the U-Net (87.9 % vs. 72.7 %). Conclusion: Our DWI segmentation tool achieved high performance with clinical review providing meaningful performance evaluation. Model development will continue towards prospective deployment before which clinical review will be repeated. This work will benefit physicians in assessing patient prognosis. � 2024 The Authors | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. | - |
dc.subject | Deep learning segmentation Diffusion-weighted imaging Ischemic stroke acute ischemic stroke adult aged Article brain infarction size deep learning diffusion weighted imaging female human image segmentation major clinical study male prediction retrospective study | - |
dc.title | Clinical performance review for 3-D Deep Learning segmentation of stroke infarct from diffusion-weighted images | - |
dc.type | Journal Article | - |
dc.contributor.swslhdauthor | Parsons, Mark W. | - |
dc.description.affiliates | Department of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Melbourne Brain Centre, Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia Southwestern Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Department of Neurology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ynirp.2024.100196 | - |
dc.identifier.department | Liverpool Hospital, Department of Neurology | - |
dc.type.studyortrial | Article | - |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Neuroimage: Reports | - |
Appears in Collections: | Liverpool Hospital |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.