Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12660
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOsan, J. K.-
dc.contributor.authorHarris, I. A.-
dc.contributor.authorHarries, D.-
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorYates, P. J.-
dc.contributor.authorJones, C. W.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T01:57:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T01:57:47Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn08835403 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12660-
dc.description.abstractBackground: We investigated if the use of augmented tibial fixation with stems in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in obese patients was associated with a difference in reason for revision, type of revision, or overall revision rate. Methods: Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry compared reason for revision, rate, and type of revision between primary TKA using stemmed tibial prostheses to nonstemmed prostheses, stratified by body mass index (BMI) and obesity. The cumulative percent revision was obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for age and sex with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All tests were 2-tailed at 5% statistical significance (P < .05). There were 66,508 procedures available for analyses. Results: Obese class 2 (BMI 35 to 39.99) had higher rates of revision in the stemmed group compared to the nonstemmed group (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.00, 2.05, P = .047). There was no significant difference in revision rates between stemmed and nonstemmed tibial prostheses in any other BMI group. Primary TKA in obese patients (BMI ?30) with a stem extension had a significantly higher rate of minor revisions compared to no stem extension (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03, 1.66, P = .025). There was no significant difference between stemmed and nonstemmed groups for major revision in obese patients and for minor or major revision in nonobese patients. Conclusion: Using a tibial stem during primary TKA in obese patients is not associated with a lower rate of revision. � 2023-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.subjectaugment obesity revision stem total knee arthroplasty Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Australia Humans Knee Prosthesis Prosthesis Failure Registries Reoperation Treatment Outcome adult age aged Article body mass clinical article comparative study controlled study disease association female follow up fracture fixation human male obese patient osteoarthritis prosthesis loosening revision arthroplasty risk reduction sex stemmed tibial fixation complication epidemiology knee replacement procedures prosthesis complication register-
dc.titleStemmed Tibial Fixation for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients?A National Registry Study-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorHarris, Ian A.-
dc.description.affiliatesOrthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia Department of Orthopaedics, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide, SA, Australia South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia St John of God Murdoch, Perth, Western Ausltralia, Australia Orthopaedics WA, St John of God Murdoch Private Hospital, Mount Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia Foundation of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia Mount Hospital, Perth, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.028-
dc.identifier.departmentLiverpool Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Arthroplasty-
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing