Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12668
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRyan, J.-
dc.contributor.authorHardcastle, N.-
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, R.-
dc.contributor.authorFerjan?i?, P.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, S. P.-
dc.contributor.authorKoh, E. S.-
dc.contributor.authorGeso, M.-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, J.-
dc.contributor.authorEbert, M. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T01:57:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T01:57:50Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn24056316 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12668-
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: Glioblastoma is one of the most common and aggressive primary brain tumours in adults. Though radiation therapy (RT) techniques have progressed significantly in recent decades, patient survival has seen little improvement. However, an area of promise is the use of fluorine-18-fluoroethyltyrosine positron-emission-tomography (18F-FET PET) imaging to assist in RT target delineation. This retrospective study aims to assess the impact of 18F-FET PET scan timing on the resultant RT target volumes and subsequent RT plans in post-operative glioblastoma patients. Materials and Methods: The imaging and RT treatment data of eight patients diagnosed with glioblastoma and treated at a single institution were analysed. Before starting RT, each patient had two 18F-FET-PET scans acquired within seven days of each other. The information from these 18F-FET-PET scans aided in the creation of two novel target volume sets. The new volumes and plans were compared with each other and the originals. Results: The median clinical target volume (CTV) 1 was statistically smaller than CTV 2. The median Dice score for the CTV1/CTV2 was 0.98 and, of the voxels that differ (median 6.5 cc), 99.7% were covered with a 5 mm expansion. Overall organs at risk (OAR) and target dosimetry were similar in the PTV1 and PTV2 plans. Conclusion: Provided the 18F-FET PET scan is acquired within two weeks of the RT planning and a comprehensive approach is taken to CTV delineation, the timing of scan acquisition has minimal impact on the resulting RT plan. � 2024 The Author(s)-
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd-
dc.subjectCTV Glioblastoma PET Radiation Therapy Radiotherapy Planning-
dc.titleThe impact of fluorine-18-fluoroethyltyrosine positron emission tomography scan timing on radiotherapy planning in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorKoh, Eng-Siew-
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800, VIC, Australia Medical Radiations Department, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne, 3083, Australia Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Grattan St, Melbourne, 3000, VIC, Australia Medical School, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, 6009, WA, Australia Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, 6009, WA, Australia Department of Medical Physics, Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, 53705, WI, United States Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Heidelberg, Melbourne, 3084, VIC, Australia Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney, 2170, NSW, Australia South West Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Sydney, 2170, NSW, Australia Department of Medical Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, 6009, WA, Australia School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, and Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, 6009, WA, Australia School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, WI, United States-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.phro.2024.100536-
dc.identifier.departmentLiverpool Hospital, Cancer Therapy Centre-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitlePhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology-
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing