Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12811
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeickhardt, A.-
dc.contributor.authorForoudi, F.-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, N.-
dc.contributor.authorXie, J.-
dc.contributor.authorSidhom, M.-
dc.contributor.authorPal, A.-
dc.contributor.authorGrimison, P.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, A.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, S.-
dc.contributor.authorTang, C.-
dc.contributor.authorHovey, E.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, C.-
dc.contributor.authorHruby, G.-
dc.contributor.authorGuminski, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMcJannett, M.-
dc.contributor.authorConduit, C.-
dc.contributor.authorTran, B.-
dc.contributor.authorDavis, I. D.-
dc.contributor.authorHayne, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T03:26:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-03T03:26:16Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn25889311 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12811-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Radiation may improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition. This study investigates the combination of pembrolizumab and chemoradiation (CRT) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of pembrolizumab combined with CRT for MIBC. Design, setting, and participants: A single-arm phase 2 trial was performed with 28 participants having cT2-T4aN0M0 MIBC (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1; estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥40 ml/min; no contraindications to pembrolizumab) suitable for CRT. Intervention: Whole bladder radiation therapy (RT; 64 Gy in 32 daily fractions, over 6.5 wk, combined with cisplatin (35 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] weekly, six doses) and pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q3 weeks, seven doses), both starting with RT. Surveillance cystoscopy/biopsy and computerised tomography scans performed 12 and 24 wk after CRT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was feasibility, determined by a prespecified satisfactory low rate of grade 3 or worse nonurinary toxicity or completion of planned CRT according to defined parameters. Secondary endpoints were complete cystoscopic response, locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Results and limitations: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled with a 31-mo median follow-up. Six had Grade >3 nonurinary adverse events during/within 12 wk after treatment; three had more than one cisplatin dose reduction. The 24-wk post-CRT complete response (CR) rate was 88%. Eight patients developed metastatic disease, and three had nonmetastatic progression. The DMFS at 2 yr is 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54-90%), with LRPFS at 2 yr of 87% (95% CI 64-96%) and median OS of 39 mo (95% CI 17.1-not evaluable). Limitations are the single-arm design and sample size. Conclusions: Combining pembrolizumab with CRT for MIBC was feasible, with manageable toxicity and promising CR rates. Patient summary: Immunotherapy treats nonmetastatic/metastatic bladder cancer effectively. We combined pembrolizumab with chemotherapy and radiation to assess its safety and impact on treatment delivery. The combination was feasible with encouraging early activity. Further larger trials are warranted. Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.subjectBladder cancer Chemoradiation Immunotherapy Aged Aged, 80 and over Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological Chemoradiotherapy Cisplatin Feasibility Studies Female Humans Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Invasiveness Treatment Outcome Urinary Bladder Neoplasms immunological antineoplastic agent monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab bladder tumor clinical trial feasibility study human pathology phase 2 clinical trial procedures tumor invasion very elderly-
dc.titlePembrolizumab with Chemoradiation as Treatment for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of the PCR-MIB Phase 2 Clinical Trial (ANZUP 1502)-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorSidhom, Mark A.-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorPal, Abhijit-
dc.description.affiliatesOlivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, Australia Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, Australia Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.011-
dc.identifier.departmentLiverpool Hospital-
dc.identifier.departmentLiverpool Hospital, Cancer Therapy Centre-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean urology oncology-
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing