Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12829
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWithers, H. G.-
dc.contributor.authorGlinsky, J. V.-
dc.contributor.authorChu, J.-
dc.contributor.authorJennings, M. D.-
dc.contributor.authorStarkey, I.-
dc.contributor.authorParmeter, R.-
dc.contributor.authorBoulos, M.-
dc.contributor.authorCruwys, J. J.-
dc.contributor.authorDuong, K.-
dc.contributor.authorJordan, I.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, D.-
dc.contributor.authorTrang, S.-
dc.contributor.authorDuong, M.-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, H.-
dc.contributor.authorHayes, A. J.-
dc.contributor.authorLambert, T. E.-
dc.contributor.authorZadro, J. R.-
dc.contributor.authorSherrington, C.-
dc.contributor.authorMaher, C.-
dc.contributor.authorLucas, B. R.-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, D.-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, M. L.-
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, L. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T03:26:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-03T03:26:21Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn18369553 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12829-
dc.description.abstractQuestion: Is remotely delivered physiotherapy as good or better than face-to-face physiotherapy for the management of musculoskeletal conditions? Design: Randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: A total of 210 adult participants with a musculoskeletal condition who presented for outpatient physiotherapy at five public hospitals in Sydney. Intervention: One group received a remotely delivered physiotherapy program for 6 weeks that consisted of one face-to-face physiotherapy session in conjunction with weekly text messages, phone calls at 2 and 4 weeks, and an individualised home exercise program delivered through an app. The other group received usual face-to-face physiotherapy care in an outpatient setting. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Patient Specific Functional Scale at 6 weeks with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of ?15 out of 100 points. Secondary outcomes included: the Patient Specific Functional Scale at 26 weeks; kinesiophobia, pain, function/disability, global impression of change and quality of life at 6 and 26 weeks; and satisfaction with service delivery at 6 weeks. Results: The mean between-group difference (95% CI) for the Patient Specific Functional Scale at 6 weeks was 2.7 out of 100 points (?3.5 to 8.8), where a positive score favoured remotely delivered physiotherapy. The lower end of the 95% CI was greater than the non-inferiority margin. Whilst non-inferiority margins were not set for the secondary outcomes, the 95% CI of the mean between-group difference ruled out clinically meaningful differences. Conclusion: Remotely delivered physiotherapy with support via phone, text and an app is as good as face-to-face physiotherapy for the management of musculoskeletal conditions. Trial registration: ACTRN12619000065190. � 2024 Australian Physiotherapy Association-
dc.publisherAustralian Physiotherapy Association-
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal conditions Physical therapy Randomised clinical trial Rehabilitation Telehealth Adult Exercise Therapy Humans Musculoskeletal Diseases Patient Satisfaction Physical Therapy Modalities Quality of Life controlled study human kinesiotherapy musculoskeletal disease physiotherapy randomized controlled trial-
dc.titleRemotely delivered physiotherapy is as effective as face-to-face physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions (REFORM): a randomised trial-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorBoulos, Max-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorCruwys, Jackson J.-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorBoulos, Max-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorJennings, Matthew D.-
dc.description.affiliatesJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Allied Health, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia Physiotherapy Department, Blacktown and Mt Druitt Hospitals, Sydney, Australia Musculoskeletal and Cancer Outpatients, Orthopaedics, ED, Fracture Clinic, Women's Health, Camden and Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia Physiotherapy Department, Camden and Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia Physiotherapy Department, Hornsby-Ku-Ring-Gai Hospital, Sydney, Australia Physiotherapy Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia Physiotherapy Department, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, Australia The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Physiotherapy Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jphys.2024.02.016-
dc.identifier.departmentCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Department of Physiotherapy-
dc.identifier.departmentWong, David-
dc.identifier.departmentLiverpool Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Physiotherapy-
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing