Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, G. J.-
dc.contributor.authorTan, H.-
dc.contributor.authorNusrat, H.-
dc.contributor.authorChang, J.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, H.-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, I.-
dc.contributor.authorShahi, J.-
dc.contributor.authorTsao, M.-
dc.contributor.authorUng, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, P.-
dc.contributor.authorLouie, A. V.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T03:26:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-03T03:26:22Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn03603016 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12833-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for ultracentral thoracic tumors at our institution. Methods and Materials: Patients with ultracentral lung tumors or nodes, defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus, treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All SBRT plans were generated with the goal of creating homogenous dose distributions. The primary endpoint was incidence of SBRT-related grade ?3 toxicity, defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V5.0). Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and identify predictors of severe toxicity and LF, while the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS. Results: A total of 154 patients receiving 162 ultracentral courses of SBRT were included. The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%), with doses ranging from 30 to 55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range, 48-115 Gy). The incidence of severe toxicity was 9.4% at 3 years. The most common severe toxicity was pneumonitis (n = 4). There was 1 possible treatment-related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of severe toxicity included increased PTV size, decreased PTV V95%, lung V5 Gy, and lung V20 Gy. The incidence of LF was 14% at 3 years. Predictors of LF included younger age and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. The median PFS was 8.8 months, while the median overall survival was 44.0 months. Conclusions: In the largest case series of ultracentral thoracic SBRT to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT was associated with relatively low rates of severe toxicity and LF. Predictors of toxicity should be interpreted in the context of the heterogeneity in toxicities observed. � 2024-
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.-
dc.subjectBiological organs Radiotherapy Risk analysis Risk assessment Risk perception Tumors Bronchial tree Common terminology criteria Dose distributions Local failure Lung tumor Methods and materials Overall survival Planning target volumes Progression free survival Stereotactic body radiation therapy Toxicity-
dc.titleSafety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Ultra-central Thoracic Tumors: A Single Center Retrospective Review-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorChang, Joe-
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.009-
dc.identifier.departmentLiverpool Hospital, Cancer Therapy Centre-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics-
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing