Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12852
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPeters, I.-
dc.contributor.authorNelson, V.-
dc.contributor.authorDeshpande, S.-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHiatt, J.-
dc.contributor.authorRoach, D.-
dc.contributor.authorErven, T.-
dc.contributor.authorRajapakse, S.-
dc.contributor.authorGray, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T03:26:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-03T03:26:27Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn26624729 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12852-
dc.description.abstractKilovoltage therapy units are used for superficial radiotherapy treatment delivery. Peer reviewed studies for MV linear accelerators describe tolerances to dosimetrically match multiple linear accelerators enabling patient treatment on any matched machine. There is an absence of literature on using a single planning data set for multiple kilovoltage units which have limited ability for beam adjustment. This study reviewed kilovoltage dosimetry and treatment planning scenarios to evaluate the feasibility of using ACPSEM annual QA tolerances to determine whether two units (of the same make and model) were dosimetrically matched. The dosimetric characteristics, such as measured half value layer (HVL), percentage depth dose (PDD), applicator factor and output variation with stand-off distance for each kV unit were compared to assess the agreement. Independent planning data based on the measured HVL for each beam energy from each kV unit was prepared. Monitor unit (MU) calculations were performed using both sets of planning data for approximately 200 clinical scenarios and compared with an overall agreement between units of < 2%. Additionally, a dosimetry measurement comparison was completed at each site for a subset of nine scenarios. All machine characterisation measurements were within the ACPSEM Annual QA tolerances, and dosimetric testing was within 2.5%. This work demonstrates that using a single set of planning data for two kilovoltage units is feasible, resulting in a clinical impact within published uncertainty. � Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2023.-
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH-
dc.subjectKilovoltage therapy Matching kilovoltage units Planning data Radiation oncology Uncertainty Humans Particle Accelerators Phantoms, Imaging Radiometry Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Dosimetry Fits and tolerances Oncology Radiotherapy Data set Dosimetry planning Matching kilovoltage unit Matchings Radiotherapy planning Radiotherapy treatment Article calculation feasibility study half value layer human percentage depth dose radiological parameters treatment planning procedures Linear accelerators-
dc.titleThe assessment of the clinical impact of using a single set of radiotherapy planning data for two kilovoltage therapy units-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.description.affiliatesSouth Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia South West Sydney Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13246-023-01339-z-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitlePhysical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine-
Appears in Collections:South Western Sydney Local Health District

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing