Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13014
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWest, T.-
dc.contributor.authorKatelaris, C. H.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T05:57:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-02T05:57:20Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn27728293 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13014-
dc.description.abstractHouse dust mite (HDM) allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has an established role in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic asthma (AA) triggered by HDM sensitization. We aimed to identify all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of HDM AIT for the treatment of AR and AA in humans and to summarize the evidence for AIT products that are currently manufactured and available for clinical use. A total of 56 eligible double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of HDM AIT for the treatment of AA and/or AR in humans fit the inclusion criteria and investigated a total of 14 commercial AIT products; together, the 56 studies enrolled a total of 14,619 patients. Of the 56 studies, 39 studies investigated the current manufacturer-recommended maintenance dose (MRMD) of the product, and 17 investigated other doses. We identified 39 studies (12,539 patients randomized) for 8 sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) products and 17 studies (2,080 patients randomized) for subcutaneous immunotherapy products. For AR, 3 products, the ALK 12 standardized-quality (SQ-HDM) SLIT tablet, the ALK 6 SQ-HDM tablet, and the SG 300 index of reactivity SLIT tablet, had both dose-finding studies (DFSs) and phase III definitive studies (DSs) to demonstrate efficacy of the MRMD of the product. For AA, 2 products, the ALK 12 SQ-HDM SLIT tablet and the ALK 6 SQ-HDM tablet, had both DFSs and DSs for the MRMD. No subcutaneous immunotherapy product had a paired DFS and DS supporting the MRMD. A total of 30 studies of products no longer commercially manufactured were excluded. This study will help to inform clinical care and product selection for the treatment of HDM-induced AR and AA. 2024 The Authors-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.subjectallergen immunotherapy allergic asthma allergic rhinitis House dust mite subcutaneous immunotherapy sublingual immunotherapy-
dc.titleThe evidence for commercial house dust mite immunotherapy products: A pragmatic systematic review with narrative synthesis-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorKatelaris, Constance H.-
dc.description.affiliatesCampbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, Australia Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100255-
dc.identifier.departmentCampbelltown Hospital, Department of Immunology and Allergy-
dc.type.studyortrialReview-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global-
Appears in Collections:Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing