Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13031
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayler, R.-
dc.contributor.authorLong, L. E.-
dc.contributor.authorCharters, E.-
dc.contributor.authorHussain, G.-
dc.contributor.authorNgo, Q.-
dc.contributor.authorTulumuri, K.-
dc.contributor.authorEade, E.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLow, T. H. H.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T05:57:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-02T05:57:25Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn26162792 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13031-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Sydney Facial Nerve Service is a multidisciplinary team that provides management of patients with facial nerve disorders, historically as an in-person format. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a shift to a virtual format due to infection control precautions. This study aims to evaluate the acceptability of a telehealth format for patients and clinicians in the multidisciplinary care of facial nerve palsy. Methods: The questionnaires were distributed either on email or mail out. Follow up telephone calls were made to non-responders. Parallel, but specific questions were designed for both patients and clinicians who have attended the clinic. Results: 40/110 patients (36.4%) and 11/11 clinicians completed questionnaires. Seventeen patients (42.5%) attended virtually, 14 (35.0%) attended in person, and nine (22.5%) attended both formats. All patients were equally satisfied with the assessment and overall experience with the clinic (P=0.900). Most patients (72.5%, 29/40) preferred in-person attendance, with preferences similar for patients from greater Sydney (80.8%) and regional/rural NSW (85.7%). Significantly more patients from interstate (57.1%) preferred a virtual format (P=0.027). Patients who required to travel >6 hours preferred virtual attendance but was not significant (P=0.053). Clinicians expressed good/excellent overall satisfaction with virtual attendance. There was a significant preference amongst the clinicians (9 of 11) for a hybrid format (P=0.003). Conclusions: Patients and clinicians were satisfied with the virtual format for assessment of facial nerve palsy. Most patients expressed preference to an in-person format whilst clinicians preferred a hybrid model. Given the high rates of satisfaction and convenience recorded, we continue to utilise a hybrid format. � Australian Journal of Otolaryngology.-
dc.publisherAME Publishing Company-
dc.subjectcoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Facial nerve palsy telehealth adult Article assessment of humans clinical article coronavirus disease 2019 demographics facial nerve paralysis female health survey human Likert scale male multidisciplinary assessment patient satisfaction questionnaire-
dc.titleUtility of telehealth for multidisciplinary assessment and management of patients with facial nerve palsy-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorNgo, Quan-
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Surgery, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia Department of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia The Sydney Facial Nerve Service, Chris O?Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Department of Plastic Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/ajo-24-5-
dc.identifier.departmentLiverpool Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian Journal of Otolaryngology-
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing