Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13075
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrince, D. S.-
dc.contributor.authorHoque, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, C.-
dc.contributor.authorMaher, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, J.-
dc.contributor.authorChomley, P.-
dc.contributor.authorPritchard-Jones, J.-
dc.contributor.authorSpruce, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMcGarry, N.-
dc.contributor.authorBaker, D.-
dc.contributor.authorElix, P.-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, K.-
dc.contributor.authorStrasser, S. I.-
dc.contributor.authorGoodger, B.-
dc.contributor.authorZekry, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMcCaughan, G. W.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-11T00:33:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-11T00:33:31Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn08159319 (ISSN)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13075-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aim: Most patients with cirrhosis have compensated disease and are cared for in primary care; however, the exact epidemiology within Australia remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess cirrhosis care in an Australian primary care setting by evaluating rates of cirrhosis diagnosis, appropriate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance and specialist communication. Methods: Electronic medical records in consenting general practices were reviewed using the ?Liver Toolkit? to identify patients with an existing cirrhosis diagnosis. Individual cases were reviewed to identify outcomes of interest. Results: One hundred seventy-one patients with confirmed cirrhosis across nine general practices were identified (74% male, mean age: 61.2�years). There was significant variation in the rate of cirrhosis diagnosis between practices (range 31.7?637.9 per 100 000 patients, P�<�0.0001). Patients with cirrhosis had predominately compensated disease (75% Child?Pugh A) and common etiologies of cirrhosis were alcohol (49%), hepatitis C (47%), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (29%). Forty-two patients (25%) had received appropriate HCC surveillance. Predictors of inadequate HCC surveillance were time from last specialist correspondence (odds ratio [OR]�=�1.06 per month increase, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02?1.10, P�=�0.002) and hepatitis B (OR�=�0.24, 95% CI: 0.06?0.98, P�=�0.047). Specialist correspondence with primary care was older than 2�years or absent in 37% of cases. Conclusions: There was a 20-fold difference in the rate of cirrhosis diagnosis between general practices within Sydney, suggesting a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed. Three quarters of patients with diagnosed cirrhosis are not receiving appropriate HCC surveillance. � 2024 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc-
dc.titleCirrhosis in primary practice: many patients remain potentially undiagnosed and are not receiving liver cancer surveillance-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.description.affiliatesAW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia Liver Injury and Cancer Program, Centenary Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia Department of Gastroenterology and Liver, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia Central and Eastern Sydney Primary Health Network, Mascot, NSW, Australia East Sydney Doctors, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia Fountain Street General Practice, Alexandria, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgh.16782-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)-
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing