Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13134
Title: | Hypothermia versus normothermia in patients with cardiac arrest and shockable rhythm: a secondary analysis of the TTM-2 study |
Author: | Taccone, F. S. Cariou, A. Zorzi, S. Friberg, H. Jakobsen, J. C. Nordberg, P. Robba, C. Belohlavek, J. Hovdenes, J. Haenggi, M. �neman, A. Grejs, A. Keeble, T. R. Annoni, F. Young, P. J. Wise, M. P. Cronberg, T. Lilja, G. Nielsen, N. Dankiewicz, J. |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Journal: | Critical Care |
Abstract: | Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether hypothermia increased survival and improved functional outcome when compared with normothermia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with similar characteristics than in previous randomized studies showing benefits for hypothermia. Methods: Post hoc analysis of a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (TTM-2, NCT02908308). In this analysis, the subset of patients included in the trial who had similar characteristics to patients included in one previous randomized trial and randomized to hypothermia at 33��C or normothermia (i.e. target < 37.8��C) were considered. The primary outcome was survival at 6�months; secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome at 6�months, defined as a modified Rankin scale of 0?3. Time-to-death and the occurrence of adverse events were also reported. Results: From a total of 1891 included in the TTM-2 study, 600 (31.7%) were included in the analysis, 294 in the hypothermia and 306 in the normothermia group. At 6�months, 207 of the 294 patients (70.4%) in the hypothermia group and 220 of the 306 patients (71.8%) in the normothermia group had survived (relative risk with hypothermia, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.15; P = 0.71). Also, 198 of the 294 (67.3%) in the hypothermia group and 202 of the 306 (66.0%) in the normothermia group had a favorable functional outcome (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.23; P = 0.79). There was a significant increase in the occurrence of arrythmias in the hypothermia group (62/294, 21.2%) when compared to the normothermia group (43/306, 14.1%?OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05?2.14; p = 0.026). Conclusions: In this study, hypothermia at 33?C did not improve survival or functional outcome in a subset of patients with similar cardiac arrest characteristics to patients in whom benefit from hypothermia was shown in prior studies. � The Author(s) 2024. |
ISSN: | 13648535 (ISSN) |
Digital object identifier: | 10.1186/s13054-024-05119-3 |
URI: | https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13134 |
Appears in Collections: | Liverpool Hospital |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.