Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/9243
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHanna, S.-
dc.contributor.authorTam, C. W. M.-
dc.contributor.authorKnight, A.-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, L.-
dc.contributor.authorBan, L.-
dc.contributor.authorPellizzon, B.-
dc.contributor.authorParks, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-22T01:15:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-22T01:15:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/9243-
dc.description.abstractOlder women seem to have lower GP follow-up rates after an emergency department (ED) discharge than men. This qualitative study investigated how older women seek GP follow up after an ED visit. In 2018, women aged ≥65 years were recruited from an ED in a suburban hospital in south-western Sydney, Australia, and then contacted 1 week later for a telephone interview exploring factors associated with their follow-up behaviour. Grounded theory was used to construct a potential explanatory model of follow-up behaviours. Of the 100 women recruited, 64% had attended a GP follow up by Day 7, as instructed. The balance of perceived cost and benefit of GP follow up emerged as a useful model to understand the factors affecting follow-up behaviour. Perceived costs included inconvenience caused to self and others, access to transport options and the availability of a patient's GP. Perceived benefits included previous experiences with the healthcare system, pre-existing health-seeking behaviours and ED messaging. Our findings suggest that follow-up rates could be improved by strengthening the perceived benefit of GP follow up at the point of ED discharge, in addition to addressing perceived costs. Approaches may include ensuring discharge instructions are purposeful and given in the company of an older woman's social supports.-
dc.subjectcommunity health care delivery of health care: integrated emergency medical services health behaviour health transition Aged Aged, 80 and over Australia Emergency Service, Hospital Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Follow-Up Studies General Practice Geriatric Assessment Healthcare Disparities Humans Interviews as Topic Patient Discharge Transitional Care adult article community care emergency health service emergency ward follow up grounded theory health behavior health care system human major clinical study population dynamics social support evaluation study health care disparity hospital discharge hospital emergency service interview procedures very elderly-
dc.titleThe ED2GP (emergency department to general practice) for Women study: Understanding lower follow-up rates among older women-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorPellizzon, Belinda-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorBan, Lucille-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorParks, James-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorTam, Michael-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorKnight, Andrew-
dc.contributor.swslhdauthorHanna, Shaddy-
dc.description.affiliatesUnsw Medicine, Wallace Wurth Building 18 High Street, Kensington, 2052, NSW, Australia Primary and Integrated Care Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, PO Box 215, Villawood, 2163, NSW, Australia School of Population Health, Unsw, Samuels Building, Sydney, 2052, NSW, Australia Emergency Department, Fairfield Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Prairievale Road and Polding Street, Prairiewood, 2176, NSW, Australia School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, 2751, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/PY19221-
dc.identifier.departmentFairfield Hospital, Nursing-
dc.identifier.departmentFairfield Hospital, Emergency Department-
dc.identifier.departmentFairfield Hospital, General Practice Unit-
dc.type.studyortrialArticle-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian Journal of Primary Health-
Appears in Collections:Fairfield Hospital
South Western Sydney Local Health District

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing