Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/11999
Title: An internet intervention to improve asthma management: Rationale and protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Authors: Arguel, A.
Lau, A. Y. S.
Dennis, S.
Liaw, S. T.
Coiera, E.
SWSLHD Author: Liaw, Siaw-Teng
Affiliates: Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Academic General Practice Unit, Fairfield Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Department: Fairfield Hospital, General Practice Unit
Issue Date: 2013
Journal: JMIR Research Protocols
Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc.
Abstract: Background: Many studies have shown the effectiveness of self-management for patients with asthma. In particular, possession and use of a written asthma action plan provided by a doctor has shown to significantly improve patients' asthma control. Yet, uptake of a written asthma action plan and preventative asthma management is low in the community, especially amongst adults. Objective: A Web-based personally controlled health management system (PCHMS) called Healthy.me will be evaluated in a 2010 CONSORT-compliant 2-group (static websites verse PCHMS) parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) (allocation ratio 1:1). Methods: The PCHMS integrates an untethered personal health record with consumer care pathways and social forums. After eligibility assessment, a sample of 300 adult patients with moderate persistent asthma will be randomly assigned to one of these arms. After 12 months of using either Healthy.me or information websites (usual care arm), a post-study assessment will be conducted. Results: The primary outcome measure is possession of or revision of an asthma action plan during the study. Secondary outcome measures include: (1) adherence to the asthma action plan, (2) rate of planned and unplanned visits to healthcare providers for asthma issues, (3) usage patterns of Healthy.me and attrition rates, (4) asthma control and asthma exacerbation scores, and (5) impact of asthma on life and competing demands, and days lost from work. Conclusions: This RCT will provide insights into whether access to an online PCHMS will improve uptake of a written asthma action plan and preventative asthma actions. Trial registration: Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000716864; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=362714 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6IYBJGRnW).
URI: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/11999
ISSN: 19290748 (ISSN)
Digital object identifier: 10.2196/resprot.2695
Appears in Collections:Fairfield Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing