Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13029
Title: | Using Virtual Reality to teach ultrasound-guided needling skills for regional anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial |
Author: | Chuan, A. Bogdanovych, A. Moran, B. Chowdhury, S. Lim, Y. C. Tran, M. T. Lee, T. Y. Duong, J. Qian, J. Bui, T. Chua, A. M. H. Jeyaratnam, B. Siu, S. Tiong, C. McKendrick, M. McLeod, G. A. |
SWSLHD Author: | Chuan, Alwin Chowdhury, Supriya Tran, Minh T. Jeyaratnam, Bahaven Siu, Steven Tiong, Clement Bui, Tung Chua, Alex M. |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Journal: | Journal of Clinical Anesthesia |
Abstract: | Study objective: We previously designed and validated a virtual reality-based simulator to help train novices in ultrasound-guided needling skills necessary for safe and competent ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. This study was designed to compare the performance and error rates of novices trained by a human faculty aided with the assistance of this virtual reality simulator (virtual reality-assisted training), versus novices trained wholly by humans (conventional training). Design, setting, and participants: In this single centre, randomised controlled study, we used a standardised teaching protocol, rigorous blinding, iterative training of assessors, and validated global rating scale and composite error score checklists to assess skills learning of novice participants. Main results: We recruited 45 novices and scored 270 assessments of performance and error rates. Inter-rater correlation coefficient of reliability of scoring between assessors for the global rating scale was 0.84 (95%CI 0.68?0.92) and for the composite error score checklist was 0.87 (95%CI 0.73?0.93). After adjustment for age, sex, Depression, Anxiety and Stress-21, and baseline score, there was no statistical difference for virtual reality-assisted training compared to conventional training in final global rating score (average treatment effect ?3.30 (95%CI-13.07?6.48), p = 0.51) or in the final composite error score (average treatment effect 1.14 (95%CI -0.60?2.88), p = 0.20). Realism in the virtual reality simulator was similar to real-life when measured by the Presence Questionnaire, all components p > 0.79; and task workload assessed by the NASA-Task Load Index was not statistically different between groups, average treatment effect 5.02 (95%CI -3.51?13.54), p = 0.25. Results were achieved in the virtual reality-assisted group with half the human faculty involvement. Conclusion: Novices trained using a hybrid, virtual reality-assisted teaching program showed no superiority to novices trained using a conventional teaching program, but with less burden on teaching resources. � 2024 The Authors |
ISSN: | 09528180 (ISSN) |
Digital object identifier: | 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111535 |
URI: | https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13029 |
Department: | Liverpool Hospital, Department of Anaesthetics |
Appears in Collections: | Liverpool Hospital |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.