Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13106
Title: Establishing a peritoneal dialysis technique survival core outcome measure: A standardised outcomes in nephrology-peritoneal dialysis consensus workshop report
Authors: Elphick, E. H.
Manera, K. E.
Viecelli, A. K.
Craig, J. C.
Cho, Y.
Ju, A.
Shen, J. I.
Wilkie, M.
Anumudu, S.
Boudville, N.
Chow, J. S. F.
Davies, S. J.
Gooden, P.
Harris, T.
Jain, A. K.
Liew, A.
Matus-Gonzalez, A.
Amir, N.
Nadeau-Fredette, A. C.
Nguyen, T.
Wang, A. Y. M.
Ponce, D.
Quinn, R.
Jaure, A.
Johnson, D. W.
Lambie, M.
Affiliates: School of Medicine, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, Keele, United Kingdom Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia Centre for Kidney Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States Department of Nephrology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, South Yorks, Sheffield, United Kingdom Department of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia South Western Sydney Nursing & Midwifery Research Alliance, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia School of Health Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia Patient Participant, Greater London, United Kingdom PKD International, London, United Kingdom Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada Department of Renal Medicine, Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore Department of Medicine, H�pital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Universit� de Montr�al, Montr�al, QC, Canada Department of Renal Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Botucatu School of Medicine, S�o Paulo State University, Brazil Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Issue Date: 2024
Journal: Peritoneal Dialysis International
Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
Abstract: Background: Technique survival, also reported with negative connotations as technique failure or transfer from peritoneal dialysis to haemodialysis, has been identified by patients, caregivers and health professionals as a critically important outcome to be reported in all trials. However, there is wide variation in how peritoneal dialysis technique survival is defined, measured and reported, leading to difficulty in comparing or consolidating results. Methods: We conducted an online international consensus workshop to establish a core outcome measure of technique survival. Discussions were analysed thematically. Results: Fifty-five participants including 14 patients and caregivers from 13 countries took part in facilitated breakout discussions using video-conferencing. The following themes were identified: capturing important aspects of the outcome (requiring a core event to define the outcome, distinguishing temporary from permanent events, recognising heterogeneous experiences of transfers), adopting appropriate neutral nomenclature (conveying with clarity, avoiding negative connotations), and ensuring feasibility and applicability (capturing data relevant to clinical and research settings, ease of adoption). The suggested definitions for the core outcome measure were ?the event of a transfer to haemodialysis?, or ?discontinuation of peritoneal dialysis?. Applying the principles described within the workshop, defining the outcome measure as a ?transfer to haemodialysis? was preferable. Conclusions: It is proposed that the core outcome of technique survival is redefined as ?transfer to haemodialysis? and that its components are standardised using simple, neutral terminology Components considered important by stakeholders included recording the reasons for transfer from peritoneal dialysis, and focussing on permanent events whilst ensuring the outcome remains easy to implement. � The Author(s) 2024.
URI: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13106
ISSN: 08968608 (ISSN)
Digital object identifier: 10.1177/08968608241287684
Appears in Collections:South Western Sydney Local Health District

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing