Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13185
Title: | Routine cognitive screening for older people undergoing major elective surgery: Benefits, risks and costs |
Authors: | Chan, L. K. M. Chuan, A. Berney, C. R. Chan, D. K. Y. |
SWSLHD Author: | Chan, Daniel K. Berney, Christophe R. |
Affiliates: | Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, 4215, QLD, Australia School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Australia Anaesthetics Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, NSW, Australia General Surgery Department, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, 2200, NSW, Australia Department of Aged Care and Rehabilitation, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, 2200, NSW, Australia |
Department: | Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Department of Aged Care & Rehabilitation Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Department of General Surgery |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Journal: | Anaesthesia and Intensive Care |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications Inc. |
Abstract: | Cognitive impairment and older age are major risk factors for postoperative delirium. Professional societies have advocated preoperative screening to identify at-risk individuals for implementation of interventions, which have moderate effectiveness in preventing delirium. However, it remains unclear from the guidelines whether screening should be completed routinely for all older individuals or targeted, and also which specific screening tool is preferred. In addition, the responsibility for screening remains undesignated in the guidelines provided. We reviewed the benefits and risks of routine screening. We also performed a cost-benefit analysis of routine screening (versus no screening). Furthermore, we summarised the sensitivities and specificities of commonly used screening tools and reviewed evolving screening tools that may have an increasing role in future practice. We concluded that routine screening is useful and appears to be cost-effective for reducing postoperative delirium, with a cost-benefit ratio of 2.89 (adjusted ratio of 2.34), and has additional advantages over other approaches such as targeted screening or routine intervention. � The Author(s) 2024. |
URI: | https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13185 |
ISSN: | 0310057X (ISSN) |
Digital object identifier: | 10.1177/0310057X241232421 |
Appears in Collections: | Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital Liverpool Hospital |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.