Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13228
Title: | Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study |
Authors: | West, M. L. Rathbone, J. A. Bilal, M. Fernando, A. N. Sharp, G. |
SWSLHD Author: | Bilal, Maria |
Affiliates: | Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia Macarthur Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia |
Department: | Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Macarthur Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism Service |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Journal: | Journal of General Internal Medicine |
Publisher: | Springer |
Abstract: | Background: Weight bias is characterised by negative attitudes towards people with a higher weight and is widespread in healthcare. Primary care professionals sometimes avoid discussing weight with patients due to concerns about upsetting them, insufficient training, resources, or referral pathways. There is, however, a responsibility for primary care professionals to address the health needs of patients, which may require discussing weight. Objective: The current study aimed to understand primary care professionals and trainee perceptions of the appropriateness of weight-centric, weight-inclusive/holistic, and avoidant approaches for discussing weight with higher weight individuals when patients were and were not seeking weight management advice. Design: Mixed methods design. Participants: Primary care professionals and trainees (N = 112) within Australia. Approach: Participants first completed an online survey and provided demographic data and completed measures of implicit and explicit weight bias. Secondly, participants viewed simulated patient consultations, reflecting each of the three approaches (weight-centric, weight-inclusive/holistic, and avoidant) in a weight-related and non-weight related context. Participants then evaluated the appropriateness of the language and strategies used. Key results: The participants showed, on average, low to moderate levels of explicit weight bias but high levels of implicit weight bias. For the consultations, language and strategies of the holistic approach were considered the most appropriate in both contexts. In the weight-related consultation, language used in the weight-centric and avoidant approaches were deemed equally inappropriate. However, weight-centric strategies were considered more appropriate than avoidant strategies. In the non-weight related consultation, the language and strategies of the avoidant approach were considered more appropriate than those of the weight-centric approach. Conclusions: Primary care professionals and trainees favoured the holistic approach to discussing weight when patients presented with weight-related or non-weight related concerns. These findings have potential practical implications for health professional education. � The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2024. |
URI: | https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/13228 |
ISSN: | 08848734 (ISSN) |
Digital object identifier: | 10.1007/s11606-024-09202-x |
Appears in Collections: | Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.