Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/8673
Title: Tenecteplase Improves Reperfusion across Time in Large Vessel Stroke
Author: Yogendrakumar, V.
Beharry, J.
Churilov, L.
Alidin, K.
Ugalde, M.
Pesavento, L.
Weir, L.
Mitchell, P. J.
Kleinig, T. J.
Yassi, N.
Thijs, V.
Wu, T. Y.
Shah, D. G.
Dewey, H. M.
Wijeratne, T.
Yan, B.
Desmond, P. M.
Sharma, G.
Parsons, M. W.
Donnan, G. A.
Davis, S. M.
Campbell, B. C. V.
for the Royal Melbourne Stroke, R.
Collaborators, E.-I. T.
SWSLHD Author: Parsons, Mark. W.
Issue Date: 2023
Journal: Annals of Neurology
Abstract:  Objective: Tenecteplase improves reperfusion compared to alteplase in patients with large vessel occlusions. To determine whether this improvement varies across the spectrum of thrombolytic agent to reperfusion assessment times, we performed a comparative analysis of tenecteplase and alteplase reperfusion rates. Methods: Patients with large vessel occlusion and treatment with thrombolysis were pooled from the Melbourne Stroke Registry, and the EXTEND-IA and EXTEND-IA TNK trials. The primary outcome, thrombolytic-induced reperfusion, was defined as the absence of retrievable thrombus or >50% reperfusion at imaging reassessment. We compared the treatment effect of tenecteplase and alteplase, accounting for thrombolytic to assessment exposure times, via Poisson modeling. We compared 90-day outcomes of patients who achieved reperfusion with a thrombolytic to patients who achieved reperfusion via endovascular therapy using ordinal logistic regression. Results: Among 893 patients included in the primary analysis, thrombolytic-induced reperfusion was observed in 184 (21%) patients. Tenecteplase was associated with higher rates of reperfusion (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-2.07, p = 0.01). Findings were consistent in patient subgroups with first segment (aIRR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.93-2.14) and second segment (aIRR = 2.07, 95% CI = 0.98-4.37) middle cerebral artery occlusions. Increased thrombolytic to reperfusion assessment times were associated with reperfusion (tenecteplase: adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.08 per 15 minutes, 95% CI = 1.04-1.13 vs alteplase: aRR = 1.06 per 15 minutes, 95% CI = 1.00-1.13). No significant treatment-by-time interaction was observed (p = 0.87). Reperfusion via thrombolysis was associated with improved 90-day modified Rankin Scale scores (adjusted common odds ratio = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.54-3.01) compared to patients who achieved reperfusion following endovascular therapy. Interpretation: Tenecteplase, compared to alteplase, increases prethrombectomy reperfusion, regardless of the time from administration to reperfusion assessment. Prethrombectomy reperfusion is associated with better clinical outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:489-499. © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
Digital object identifier: 10.1002/ana.26547
URI: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/8673
Department: Liverpool Hospital, Department of Neurology
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing