Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12829
Title: Remotely delivered physiotherapy is as effective as face-to-face physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions (REFORM): a randomised trial
Author: Withers, H. G.
Glinsky, J. V.
Chu, J.
Jennings, M. D.
Starkey, I.
Parmeter, R.
Boulos, M.
Cruwys, J. J.
Duong, K.
Jordan, I.
Wong, D.
Trang, S.
Duong, M.
Liu, H.
Hayes, A. J.
Lambert, T. E.
Zadro, J. R.
Sherrington, C.
Maher, C.
Lucas, B. R.
Taylor, D.
Ferreira, M. L.
Harvey, L. A.
SWSLHD Author: Boulos, Max
Cruwys, Jackson J.
Boulos, Max
Jennings, Matthew D.
Issue Date: 2024
Journal: Journal of Physiotherapy
Abstract:  Question: Is remotely delivered physiotherapy as good or better than face-to-face physiotherapy for the management of musculoskeletal conditions? Design: Randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: A total of 210 adult participants with a musculoskeletal condition who presented for outpatient physiotherapy at five public hospitals in Sydney. Intervention: One group received a remotely delivered physiotherapy program for 6 weeks that consisted of one face-to-face physiotherapy session in conjunction with weekly text messages, phone calls at 2 and 4 weeks, and an individualised home exercise program delivered through an app. The other group received usual face-to-face physiotherapy care in an outpatient setting. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Patient Specific Functional Scale at 6 weeks with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of ?15 out of 100 points. Secondary outcomes included: the Patient Specific Functional Scale at 26 weeks; kinesiophobia, pain, function/disability, global impression of change and quality of life at 6 and 26 weeks; and satisfaction with service delivery at 6 weeks. Results: The mean between-group difference (95% CI) for the Patient Specific Functional Scale at 6 weeks was 2.7 out of 100 points (?3.5 to 8.8), where a positive score favoured remotely delivered physiotherapy. The lower end of the 95% CI was greater than the non-inferiority margin. Whilst non-inferiority margins were not set for the secondary outcomes, the 95% CI of the mean between-group difference ruled out clinically meaningful differences. Conclusion: Remotely delivered physiotherapy with support via phone, text and an app is as good as face-to-face physiotherapy for the management of musculoskeletal conditions. Trial registration: ACTRN12619000065190. � 2024 Australian Physiotherapy Association
ISSN: 18369553 (ISSN)
Digital object identifier: 10.1016/j.jphys.2024.02.016
URI: https://swslhd.intersearch.com.au/swslhdjspui/handle/1/12829
Department: Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Department of Physiotherapy
Wong, David
Liverpool Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy
Appears in Collections:Liverpool Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Prosentient are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing